Society needs trust because it increasingly finds itself operating at the edge between confidence in what is known from everyday experience, and contingency of new possibilities. Without trust, all contingent possibilities should be always considered, leading to a paralysis of inaction. Trust can be seen as a bet on one of contingent futures, the one that may deliver benefits. Once the bet is decided (i.e. trust is granted), the trustor suspends his or her disbelief, and the possibility of a negative course of action is not considered at all. Because of it, trust acts as a reductor of social complexity, allowing for actions that are otherwise too complex to be considered (or even impossible to consider at all); specifically for cooperation.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Best of TMK
-
Rouse to bring out of a state of sleep, unconsciousness, inactivity, fancied security, apathy, depression, etc.: He was roused to action by ...
-
In political theory and theology, to immanentize the eschaton means trying to bring about the eschaton (the final, heaven-like stage of hist...
-
The theory proposes that the universe is an engine designed for the production and conservation of novelty. Novelty, in this context, can be...
-
The ego is the organized part of the personality structure that includes defensive, perceptual, intellectual-cognitive, and executive funct...
-
In this lecture, Terence McKenna talks about the tragic situation we humans have placed ourselves in, and ways in which the boundry dissolut...
